SpinOffs

A blog on what's new, notable, and next in turbomachinery

Vibration and Resonance Issues in Turbomachines

By Arsalan Adil
Nov 29, 2017


Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Structural vibration is a natural phenomenon exhibited by all structures, by virtue of simply possessing mass and having an associated structural stiffness. Thus, any structure or assembly of structures, with a mass attribution, will possess some structural stiffness. This stiffness will characterize the vibrational response of the structure, depending on the type of boundary conditions constraining the structure. For complex structural configurations, this vibrational response can be determined by numerical techniques, such as the finite element method, which allows calculation of the natural frequencies of vibration of the structure and the respective mode shapes of vibration associated with each of these natural frequencies.

 

Structural vibration is a natural phenomenon exhibited by all structures, by virtue of simply possessing mass and having an associated structural stiffness. Thus, any structure or assembly of structures, with a mass attribution, will possess some structural stiffness. This stiffness will characterize the vibrational response of the structure, depending on the type of boundary conditions constraining the structure. For complex structural configurations, this vibrational response can be determined by numerical techniques, such as the finite element method, which allows calculation of the natural frequencies of vibration of the structure and the respective mode shapes of vibration associated with each of these natural frequencies.

 

In the mechanical design of turbomachinery, it is critical to determine the natural frequencies of vibration—of individual components such as radial and axial compressors and turbines using finite element analysis in a software package such as pbFEA, as well as the complete rotor assembly via rotordynamic analysis in a software package such as DyRoBeS. The mechanical design process then intersects the aerodynamic design process of the turbomachine and seeks to avoid any running operation at or near these natural frequencies within a certain error margin, which is typically a best design practice. This is critical to avoid potential excitation of any of the natural modes of vibration, because this can lead to resonance, and ultimately, high-cycle fatigue failure of the machine or assembly.

 

The vibrational modes for radial turbomachines are generally identifiable through two major forms of shape: those in which only the blade vibrational behavior is dominant, and those in which the impeller or rotor disc also participates in vibration. A pbFEA computation of the primary-blade flapping mode of a typical turbochargercentrifugal compressor is shown in the figure below. Blade mode shapes that exhibit high-order, complex behavior are more difficult to excite than primary blade-flapping or second-order, blade-bending modes, in that they require much higher excitation energy from the driving source, and hence pose less risk or concern of high-cycle fatigue failure. The running speeds corresponding to disc modal frequencies, however, are completely avoided, since disk failure modes tend to be significantly more destructive than blade failure modes.

 

pbFEA computation of the primary-blade flapping mode of a typical turbocharger centrifugal compressor.jpg

 

As best practice, it is sought, through mechanical design, to have all blade and disc vibrational modal frequencies of the turbomachine to be above 4x that of the running passing excitation frequency of the turbomachine, with a 10% computational error margin. Additionally, fundamental blade and all disc modal frequencies lying at multiples of synchronous passing excitation frequencies that correspond to any upstream or downstream stator components are also avoided; this means that any radial turbomachine designed, for example, with 6 inlet guide vanes, must not have a primary or secondary blade modal frequency, or any disc modal frequency, within 10% error margin of the 6x running passing excitation frequency of the turbomachine. The pbFEA software will automatically create a  Campbell (shown below) and/or interference diagram(s) so that an analyst can ensure that this is achieved, and through these mechanical design procedures, high-cycle fatigue failure of turbomachines is avoided.

 

pbFEA Campbell Diagram.png

Tags: Engineering

Subscribe to SpinOffs